Southern Printers' Supply Co. v. Felker
This text of 54 S.E. 193 (Southern Printers' Supply Co. v. Felker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where suit was brought on an open account for an indebtedness, and on the trial it appeared that there was a written contract between the parties, which was introduced, and the evidence for the-plaintiff was to the effect that there had been complete performance by it of its part of the contract and nothing remained to be done but for the defendant to make payment, it was error to grant a nonsuit. Hancock v. Ross, 18 Ga. 304; Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co., 93 Ga. 594; Burch v. Harrell, Id. 719; Johnson v. Quin, 52 Ga. 485; Schmidt v. Wambacker, 62 Ga. 321.
2. The case of Blue v. Ford, 12 Ga. 45, has been distinguished from rulings-of the character here made, on the ground that the plaintiff had not fully completed his contract. Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co., 93 Ga. 598.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 S.E. 193, 125 Ga. 148, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-printers-supply-co-v-felker-ga-1906.