Southern Pan & Shoring Co. v. Jackson

378 S.E.2d 854, 259 Ga. 260, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 185
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 4, 1989
Docket46300
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 378 S.E.2d 854 (Southern Pan & Shoring Co. v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Pan & Shoring Co. v. Jackson, 378 S.E.2d 854, 259 Ga. 260, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 185 (Ga. 1989).

Opinion

Weltner, Justice.

The facts of this case are set forth fully in Jackson v. Southern Pan & Shoring Co., 258 Ga. 401 (369 SE2d 239) (1988).

Jackson attempted to exercise a stock purchase warrant in May 1987. Southern Pan initiated a declaratory judgment action challenging the validity of the warrant. This court held that “[t]he trial court . . . erred by holding the warrant invalid and erred by denying Jackson’s motion for summary judgment on her claim that the warrant is valid and enforceable.” Jackson v. Southern Pan & Shoring Co., 258 Ga. at 403. Additionally, we entered the following order: “Sarah B. Jackson has filed with this Court a Motion for Restraining Order and Other Equitable Relief, which we decline to reach. The trial court is directed to hear and decide this motion pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-62 (c).”

After hearing, the trial court entered a restraining order against Southern Pan. Following additional motions and hearings, the trial court entered a second order, directing inter alia that Southern Pan relinquish control of the company to Jackson and issue share certificates accordingly. Southern Pan appealed.

These orders were consistent with the order of this court. The trial court did not abuse its discretion, nor exceed the bounds of its [261]*261lawful authority.

Decided May 4, 1989 Reconsideration denied May 31, 1989. Martin, Snow, Grant & Napier, George C. Grant, Edward J. Harrell, Rich, Bass, Kidd & Witcher, Casper Rich, King & Spalding, Griffin B. Bell, M. Robert Thornton, for appellants. Sell & Melton, John D. Comer, Ellwood F. Oakley III, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., who concurs in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Southern Pan & Shoring Co.
390 S.E.2d 393 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 S.E.2d 854, 259 Ga. 260, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-pan-shoring-co-v-jackson-ga-1989.