Southern Pacific Company v. Sharp

California Court of Appeal

Southern Pacific Company v. Sharp

168 P. 148, 34 Cal. App. 803, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 178

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 4, 1917

DocketCiv. No. 2069.

StatusPublished

This text of 168 P. 148 (Southern Pacific Company v. Sharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Pacific Company v. Sharp, 168 P. 148, 34 Cal. App. 803, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 178 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

As in the case of the same plaintiff against Ellen Dore et al., No. 2068 (ante, p. 521, [168 P. 147]), this day decided, the appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants after demurrer sustained to the complaint. It presents the same point as did that case, and the question was submitted and argued on the same briefs. The conclusion arrived at there is controlling here, and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment here is affirmed.

Richards, J., and Beasly, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on November 3, 1917. *Page 804

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As in the case of the same plaintiff against Ellen Dore et al., No. 2068 (ante, p. 521, [168 P. 147]), this day decided, the appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants after demurrer sustained to the complaint. It presents the same point as did that case, and the question was submitted and argued on the same briefs. The conclusion arrived at there is controlling here, and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment here is affirmed.

Richards, J., and Beasly, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on November 3, 1917. *Page 804

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 P. 148, 34 Cal. App. 803, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-pacific-company-v-sharp-calctapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack