Southern Pacific Company, a Corporation v. Lawrence C. Kearney
This text of 307 F.2d 511 (Southern Pacific Company, a Corporation v. Lawrence C. Kearney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
307 F.2d 511
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant,
v.
Lawrence C. KEARNEY, Appellee.
No. 17755.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 19, 1962.
Bledsoe, Smith, Cathcart, Johnson & Phelps, Joseph W. Rogers, Jr., and Robert A. Seligson, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Happerle & Hepperle, and Robert R. Hepperle, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District judge.
PER CURIAM.
On an examination of the record, we are satisfied that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 F.2d 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-pacific-company-a-corporation-v-lawrence-c-kearney-ca9-1962.