Southern Pacific Co. v. Melvin
This text of 157 F. 1005 (Southern Pacific Co. v. Melvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plea of privilege, based on facts to be proved, was voluntarily submitted to the judge a quo without the intervention of a jury. As there was no agreed statement of facts, nor any special finding of facts, we must accept the judge’s findings on the said plea as conclusive. Lehnen v. Dickson, 148 U. S. 71, 13 Sup. Ct 481, 37 L. Ed. 373. On the plea of lis pen-dens, and on the evidence submitted, we concur in the ruling of the trial judge. In the trial of the main case we find no reversible error. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 F. 1005, 85 C.C.A. 679, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 3963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-pacific-co-v-melvin-ca5-1908.