Southern Pac. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
This text of 188 F. 241 (Southern Pac. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commerce Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill in this case was filed for the same purpose as the bill in case No. 2, Atchison, Topeka & Santa F6 Railway Co. Southern Pacific Co., and San Pedro, Dos Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Co., v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States, 188 Fed. 229, except that the switching service for which a charge is claimed is performed at the city of San Francisco, Cal.
For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in case No. 2, above mentioned, the motion for a temporary injunction made by the petitioners is granted, and the motion to dismiss made by the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission is denied.
MACK, Judge, dissenting. See 188 Fed. 929.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 F. 241, 1911 U.S. Commerce Ct. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-pac-co-v-interstate-commerce-commission-com-1911.