Southern Oregon Barter Fair v. Jackson County

401 F.3d 1124
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 2005
Docket02-35560
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 401 F.3d 1124 (Southern Oregon Barter Fair v. Jackson County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Oregon Barter Fair v. Jackson County, 401 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2005).

Opinions

ORDER

Judges Rawlinson and Bybee have voted to deny' the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Alarcon so recommends.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing en banc, filed July 21, 2004, is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 F.3d 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-oregon-barter-fair-v-jackson-county-ca9-2005.