Southern Nazarene University v. HES Facilities Management LLC

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma·Decided September 2, 2025·No. 5:25-cv-00802·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SOUTHERN NAZARENE ) UNIVERSITY, ) ) Plaintiff, )

) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-802-D )

HES FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, ) LLC, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6]. In response, Plaintiff timely filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 10], as authorized by FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(1)(B). Upon consideration, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion to dismiss, directed at Plaintiff’s original pleading, is moot. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (amended complaint supersedes the original); see also Predator Int’l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6] is DENIED as MOOT. Defendant may resubmit a motion to dismiss, if appropriate, in response to the Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 10]. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2" day of September, 2025.

Ny Q.OyPt TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Nazarene University v. HES Facilities Management LLC, (W.D. Okla. 2025).

Southern Nazarene University v. HES Facilities Management LLC (Southern Nazarene University v. HES Facilities Management LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

William H. Davis v. Txo Production Corp.
929 F.2d 1515 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)