Southern Mutual Insurance v. Pike

33 La. Ann. 823
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1881·No. No. 7635·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

On Motion to Rescind.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

Upon a verified averment of the extinction of the corporation plaintiff and of the judicial appointment of a liquidator of its affairs, an order was obtained substituting him in these proceedings.

Dissatisfied with this order, the defendants have taken a rule to rescind it.

They set forth allegations, to support which it would be necessary to hear proof, which cannot be received here. 32 An. 663; 2 An. 430.

Besides, the appellants have no authority to assail collaterally the appointment of the liquidator, which must be held as validly made until shown to have been legally vacated. 15 An. 27; 23 An. 17; 24 An. 253.

The rule is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Mutual Insurance v. Pike, 33 La. Ann. 823 (La. 1881).

33 La. Ann. 823 (Southern Mutual Insurance v. Pike) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. Foster
189 So. 601 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1939)
Charrier v. Greenlaw Truck & Tractor Co.
2 La. App. 622 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)
Colfax Motor Co. v. O'Quinn
2 La. App. 323 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)
International Harvester Co. of America v. Union Irr. Co.
72 So. 375 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
Hughes v. Edson
57 So. 154 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1911)