Southern Mutual Ins. v. Holcombe's Administrator
This text of 35 Ala. 327 (Southern Mutual Ins. v. Holcombe's Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A. J. WALKER, O. J.
The bill of exceptions, after a statement of evidence, says, that “ thereupon" the court rejected the appellant’s claim. Adopting the construction less favorable to the appellant, we cannot regard this as an assertion that the bill of exceptions contains all the evidence upon which the court acted; and consequently, we cannot affirm that there was error in the rejection oí the appellant’s claim. — Keep v. Kelly & Levin, 29 Ala. 322 ; Bradley v. Andress, 30 Ala. 80 ; Lovett v. Chisolm, 30 Ala. 88; Stein v. Feltheimer, 31 Ala. 57.
The decree of the court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Ala. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-mutual-ins-v-holcombes-administrator-ala-1859.