Southern Management Corporation Retirement Trust v. Jabaly

Fourth Circuit

Southern Management Corporation Retirement Trust v. Jabaly

474 F. App'x 389

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 23, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1306

StatusPublished

This text of 474 F. App'x 389 (Southern Management Corporation Retirement Trust v. Jabaly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Management Corporation Retirement Trust v. Jabaly, 474 F. App'x 389 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chawky Boutros Jabaly appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as moot his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order imposing sanctions against him for failing to comply with discovery and denying him a discharge in bankruptcy. The district court dismissed the appeal because the order appealed from was vacated upon the court’s acceptance of the parties’ settlement agreement. Jabaly attempts in this appeal to challenge the order accepting the settlement agreement. Because Jabaly did not appeal from that order, and did not present his challenges to the agreement in the district court, we decline to address these issues in this court. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chawky Boutros Jabaly appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as moot his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order imposing sanctions against him for failing to comply with discovery and denying him a discharge in bankruptcy. The district court dismissed the appeal because the order appealed from was vacated upon the court’s acceptance of the parties’ settlement agreement. Jabaly attempts in this appeal to challenge the order accepting the settlement agreement. Because Jabaly did not appeal from that order, and did not present his challenges to the agreement in the district court, we decline to address these issues in this court. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

474 F. App'x 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-management-corporation-retirement-trust-v-jabaly-ca4-2012.