Southern Linen Supply v. Azinger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Southern Linen Supply v. Azinger

528 So. 2d 31, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1332, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2328, 1988 WL 55788

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 1988

DocketNo. 87-1102

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 528 So. 2d 31 (Southern Linen Supply v. Azinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Linen Supply v. Azinger, 528 So. 2d 31, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1332, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2328, 1988 WL 55788 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Southern Linen Supply and Fred S. James & Company of Florida, Inc. (E/C) appeal from an order of the deputy commissioner awarding wage loss benefits. The deputy’s order is affirmed in all respects save that it is remanded with directions that claimant Azinger be required to complete and file wage loss benefit forms for all months for which they have not been filed. See Bay Steel Erections v. Chung, 458 So.2d 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Morris v. Metal Industries, 491 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Old Cove Condo v. Curry, 511 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

The E/C move for clarification, requesting that we specify that the claimant is required to file wage loss benefit forms not only for all months for which wage loss benefits were awarded, but also for all months for which temporary partial disability benefits were awarded. We decline to do so because nowhere in the E/C’s briefs is there any argument that forms should have been filed during periods of temporary partial disability.

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLS, Judge.

Southern Linen Supply and Fred S. James & Company of Florida, Inc. (E/C) appeal from an order of the deputy commissioner awarding wage loss benefits. The deputy’s order is affirmed in all respects save that it is remanded with directions that claimant Azinger be required to complete and file wage loss benefit forms for all months for which they have not been filed. See Bay Steel Erections v. Chung, 458 So.2d 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Morris v. Metal Industries, 491 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Old Cove Condo v. Curry, 511 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

The E/C move for clarification, requesting that we specify that the claimant is required to file wage loss benefit forms not only for all months for which wage loss benefits were awarded, but also for all months for which temporary partial disability benefits were awarded. We decline to do so because nowhere in the E/C’s briefs is there any argument that forms should have been filed during periods of temporary partial disability.

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 So. 2d 31, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1332, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2328, 1988 WL 55788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-linen-supply-v-azinger-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack