Southern Life Health Ins. Co. v. Williams

146 So. 624, 25 Ala. App. 360, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 43
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 1933·No. 2 Div. 514.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The appeal in this case is on the record, which discloses the pleadings, written charges given and refused, the oral charge of the court, and the verdict and judgment, but no bill of exceptions.

The giving of certain written charges for plaintiff and the refusal to give at the request of’defendant certain other charges are here assigned as error.

Under the rule laid down by the Supreme Court we cannot on this appeal consider these charges. Bell v. Burns, 206 Ala. 465, 90 So. 491; Levert v. State, 220 Ala. 425, 125 So. 664; Macertney v. Gwin, 218 Ala. 529, 119 So. 238; Alabama and Southern Digest, Appeal and Error, &wkey;544 and Criminal Law, &wkey;.1090(14).

There being no questions presented by the record that may be considered, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Life Health Ins. Co. v. Williams, 146 So. 624, 25 Ala. App. 360, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 43 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

146 So. 624 (Southern Life Health Ins. Co. v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellard v. J. Blach & Sons
103 So. 2d 713 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)