Southern Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Navy Knitting Mills, Inc.
This text of 187 A.D. 958 (Southern Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Navy Knitting Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, but without costs. There is nothing in the amendment to section 798 of the Code of Civil Procedure in 1910 that impaired the effect of Schlesinger v. Borough Bank (112 App. Div. 121) and Schlegel v. Church of Holy Trinity (194 N. Y. 391). The Schlegel ease was decided for the very purpose of settling the practice,, and the practice should not now be unsettled. The party who serves a pleading by mail thereby gives his opponent, under section 798 of the Code of Civil Procedure, three days’ additional time in which to answer or reply, and he himself has, by virtue of section 542 of the Code, also twenty-three days in which to [959]*959amend his pleading. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 A.D. 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-knitting-mills-inc-v-navy-knitting-mills-inc-nyappdiv-1919.