Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. Board of Commissioners
52 Kan. 138
Opinion
The plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in time. No brief or oral argument has been filed or presented by the defendant in error. Under the prior decisions of the court, the judgment will be reversed, and the case remanded with direction that judgment be entered in fa.-vor of the railroad company. (K. C. Rld. Co. v. Comm’rs of Jackson Co., 45 Kas. 716, and A. T. &. S. F. Rld. Co. v. Comm’rs of Osage Co., 48 id. 576, and cases there cited.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 52 Kan. 138 (kan 1893).
52 Kan. 138 (Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Highway Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
29 P.2d 1104 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1934)
City of Grafton v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.
113 N.W. 598 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1907)