Southern Insurance Co. v. Roberie

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Southern Insurance Co. v. Roberie

117 So. 2d 82, 1959 La. App. LEXIS 1131

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 21, 1959

DocketNo. 4915

StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 2d 82 (Southern Insurance Co. v. Roberie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Insurance Co. v. Roberie, 117 So. 2d 82, 1959 La. App. LEXIS 1131 (La. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

ELLIS, Judge.

As stated in the case of Pitre v. Roberie, La.App., 117 So.2d 74, this case is for the property damage paid by the insurer of LeRoy Pitre, plaintiff herein, for the value of his car destroyed, and by LeRoy Pitre individually for the $50 deductible under the terms of the policy.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Pitre v. Roberie, supra, and the additional reason that plaintiffs have proven that they are entitled to the award prayed for in their petition, and as granted them by the verdict of the jury and the judgment of this court, viz., the sum of $1,102.48 in favor of Southern Insurance Company and $50 in favor of LeRoy Pitre, both sums being with legal interest from the date of judicial demand and all costs of these proceedings, the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ELLIS, Judge.

As stated in the case of Pitre v. Roberie, La.App., 117 So.2d 74, this case is for the property damage paid by the insurer of LeRoy Pitre, plaintiff herein, for the value of his car destroyed, and by LeRoy Pitre individually for the $50 deductible under the terms of the policy.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Pitre v. Roberie, supra, and the additional reason that plaintiffs have proven that they are entitled to the award prayed for in their petition, and as granted them by the verdict of the jury and the judgment of this court, viz., the sum of $1,102.48 in favor of Southern Insurance Company and $50 in favor of LeRoy Pitre, both sums being with legal interest from the date of judicial demand and all costs of these proceedings, the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 So. 2d 82, 1959 La. App. LEXIS 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-insurance-co-v-roberie-lactapp-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack