Southern Hardware & Woodstock Co. v. Smith

123 So. 403, 11 La. App. 49, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 632
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 10, 1929
DocketNo. 479
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 123 So. 403 (Southern Hardware & Woodstock Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Hardware & Woodstock Co. v. Smith, 123 So. 403, 11 La. App. 49, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 632 (La. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

LECHE, J.

This appeal is from an order of executory process.

Plaintiff alleges itself to be the holder and owner of four certain promissory notes secured by chattel mortgage upon some automobile building or repairing machinery. It prays for citation and ordinary process upon defendant and for judgment after legal delays. It further prays for executory process, which latter process was ordered by the clerk of court to issue as prayed for. It is to this order of executory process that the present appeal was taken. It does not appear whether ordinary process has issued or. not, but that is foreign to the questions involved in this appeal.

Appellant complains that executory process issued without sufficient or proper authentic evidence.

Plaintiff styles itself the Southern Hardware & Woodstock Co., Limited. The notes are payable to the order of the Southern Hardware and Woodstock Company, and there is no authentic evidence of the transfer of the notes from the payee to the plaintiff.

The act of chattel mortgage, annexed to the petition, says the notes are dated this day, March 30, 1928, the date of the act, but the notes also annexed, are dated March 28, 1928.

These variances are fatal to the order. Hackemuller vs. Figueroa, 125 La. 307, 51 So. 207; Kreher vs. Theisman’s Estate, 125 La. 600, 51 So. 656.

For these reasons it is now ordered that the order of executory process herein issued, January 18, 1929, and signed W. E. Blossman, clerk of court, be annulled and set aside at plaintiff’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bickham Motors, Inc. v. Crain
185 So. 2d 271 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)
Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company
158 So. 2d 228 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Myrtle Grove Packing Company v. Mones
76 So. 2d 305 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 403, 11 La. App. 49, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-hardware-woodstock-co-v-smith-lactapp-1929.