Southern Gulf Utilities v. Mayo
This text of 299 So. 2d 156 (Southern Gulf Utilities v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is an appeal from a summary final judgment in which the trial court found that the question presented by appellant here was adjudicated in a previous action and final judgment of the same court be[157]*157tween appellant and appellee, the City of Ormond Beach, Florida. The question involved an interpretation of a city ordinance of appellee city as to the water rate charged appellant for water service under said ordinance.
We have considered the oral arguments of counsel and have read the judgment appealed from, the briefs of the parties, and the record. We agree with the trial judge that the question presented by appellant has been determined by said previous judgment and is now res judicata. The basis for the ruling of the trial court is fully set forth in the summary final judgment and it would serve no useful purpose to further recite it here.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 So. 2d 156, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-gulf-utilities-v-mayo-fladistctapp-1974.