Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway
This text of 22 Ga. App. 403 (Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The consignee of freight on an “order-notify shipment,” who has paid the draft attached to the bill of lading and owns the goods shipped, can not, by refusing to accept the goods, avoid the payment of freight and demurrage charges due to the carrier. ■
2. Under the pleadings and the issue submitted, the trial court did not err 'in excluding the evidence offered by the defendant.
8. The evidence authorized the judgment, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Ga. App. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-flour-grain-co-v-seaboard-air-line-railway-gactapp-1918.