Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway

22 Ga. App. 403
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 17, 1918
Docket9427
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Ga. App. 403 (Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway, 22 Ga. App. 403 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The consignee of freight on an “order-notify shipment,” who has paid the draft attached to the bill of lading and owns the goods shipped, can not, by refusing to accept the goods, avoid the payment of freight and demurrage charges due to the carrier. ■

2. Under the pleadings and the issue submitted, the trial court did not err 'in excluding the evidence offered by the defendant.

8. The evidence authorized the judgment, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

~Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Ga. App. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-flour-grain-co-v-seaboard-air-line-railway-gactapp-1918.