Southern Express Co. v. Carroll

42 Ala. 437
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

A. J. WALKER, C. J.

The judgment of the court below must .be reversed on the authority of the Oxford Iron Co. v. Spradley, MS. To sustain the judgment by default, it is requisite that it should appear otherwise than by the sheriff’s return or the clerk’s statement, that the person upon whom the summons and complaint were served occupied such a relation to the defendant, that the defendant could legally be made a party by service on such person. Section 2569, (2170), Revised Code, does not authorize proof either by the plaintiff’s affidavit or by the clerk’s statement, that the person served occupied the relation above described to the defendant.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Express Co. v. Carroll, 42 Ala. 437 (Ala. 1868).

42 Ala. 437 (Southern Express Co. v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

H. H. Hitt Lumber Co. v. Turner
65 So. 807 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Ex Parte National Lumber Mfg. Co.
41 So. 10 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. Brannum
96 Ala. 461 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Manhattan Fire Insurance v. Fowler & Co.
76 Ala. 372 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)