Southern Development Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
79 F. 212, 24 C.C.A. 497, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1752
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 25, 1897·No. No. 505·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
(after stating the facts as above). The views expressed by us in the case of Lackawanna Iron & Coal Co. v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. (No. 505 of the docket of this court) 79 Fed. 202, apply to this case, and are decisive of the issues here presented. The case of Morgan’s L. & T. R. & S. S. Co. v. Texas Cent. Ry. Co., 137 U. S, 171, 11 Sup. Ct. 61, is in point. We see no error in the action of the circuit court in dismissing the petition of the intervener, and the decree appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Development Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 79 F. 212, 24 C.C.A. 497, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1752 (5th Cir. 1897).
79 F. 212 (Southern Development Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
46 F. Supp. 120 (E.D. Missouri, 1942)
Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Kansas Telephone Co.
8 F. Supp. 287 (D. Kansas, 1934)
Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Doud
105 F. 123 (Eighth Circuit, 1900)