Southern Cross Discount Co. v. W. R. Bean & Son, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Southern Cross Discount Co. v. W. R. Bean & Son, Inc.

180 S.E.2d 926, 123 Ga. App. 363, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1224

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 19, 1971

Docket45971

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 S.E.2d 926 (Southern Cross Discount Co. v. W. R. Bean & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Cross Discount Co. v. W. R. Bean & Son, Inc., 180 S.E.2d 926, 123 Ga. App. 363, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1224 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Judge.

W. R. Bean & Son, Inc. sued the Southern Cross Discount Co. in an action on account. This action, so far as the record shows, has never been tried. In the meantime it filed summons of garnishment on various creditors, some of which answered that they held funds belonging to the defendant. Defendant dissolved the garnishments in attachment by posting bond. It also traversed certain allegations in the complaint and prayed that the pre-judgment garnishment proceedings be held void. After hearing, the trial court denied the prayers of the traverse. Defendant attempts to appeal this order, but failed to obtain a certificate of review as required by Code Ann. 6-701 (a, 2). Hammock v. Hammock, 225 Ga. 698 (171 SE2d 314); Finch v. Kilgore, 120 Ga. App. 320 (170 SE2d 304).

Appeal dismissed.

Bell, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Judge.

W. R. Bean & Son, Inc. sued the Southern Cross Discount Co. in an action on account. This action, so far as the record shows, has never been tried. In the meantime it filed summons of garnishment on various creditors, some of which answered that they held funds belonging to the defendant. Defendant dissolved the garnishments in attachment by posting bond. It also traversed certain allegations in the complaint and prayed that the pre-judgment garnishment proceedings be held void. After hearing, the trial court denied the prayers of the traverse. Defendant attempts to appeal this order, but failed to obtain a certificate of review as required by Code Ann. 6-701 (a, 2). Hammock v. Hammock, 225 Ga. 698 (171 SE2d 314); Finch v. Kilgore, 120 Ga. App. 320 (170 SE2d 304).

Appeal dismissed.

Bell, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 S.E.2d 926, 123 Ga. App. 363, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-cross-discount-co-v-w-r-bean-son-inc-gactapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack