Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Overby

76 S.E. 999, 139 Ga. 209, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 379
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 14, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 S.E. 999 (Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Overby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Overby, 76 S.E. 999, 139 Ga. 209, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 379 (Ga. 1913).

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

The evidence submitted on the trial was amply sufficient to authorize a finding that the operation of the cotton ginnery to be erected by the defendants below would prove a nuisance to the plaintiffs. Even if any of the evidence introduced by the plaintiffs was open to the objection of irrelevancy, it was not of such character that its admission required the grant of a new trial. The charge was full and fair, and the exceptions thereto were without merit. There was no abuse of ' discretion in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knox v. Reese
100 S.E. 371 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E. 999, 139 Ga. 209, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-cotton-oil-co-v-overby-ga-1913.