Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Howle

82 So. 560, 17 Ala. App. 112, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 132
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 21, 1919
Docket5 Div. 290.
StatusPublished

This text of 82 So. 560 (Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Howle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Howle, 82 So. 560, 17 Ala. App. 112, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 132 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

BRICKEN,

J. On this appeal the rulings of the court in refusing the affirmative charge requested in writing by the appellant (plaintiff in the court below), and the overruling of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, are assigned as error.

A careful examination of the entire record and all the evidence (which was in sharp conflict upon the issues involved) clearly shows that the court did not err in refusing the affirmative charge requested by plaintiff. We are also of the opinion that there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

' No error appearing in the record, the judgment of the circuit court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 560, 17 Ala. App. 112, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-cotton-oil-co-v-howle-alactapp-1919.