Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Bull

43 S.E. 52, 116 Ga. 776, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 256
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 12, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

This being ,an application by a taxpayer and property-holder to restrain a railroad conipany and a manufacturing corporation from building a spur-track of the railroad across a public street in a town, and a preponderance of the evidence showing that the place to be crossed is a public street and that running a locomotive and train thereon will be a nuisance to the plaintiff and will inflict special damage on her property, and there being no express legislative authority for building the spur-track across the street, and no evidence on the minutes of the town council to show its assent to the building of the track, the judge did not abuse his discretion in granting a temporary injunction.

Judgment affirmed,.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Bull, 43 S.E. 52, 116 Ga. 776, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 256 (Ga. 1902).

43 S.E. 52 (Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Bull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tift v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
131 S.E. 46 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)