Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc., Govind & Associates, Inc., and W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
This text of Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc., Govind & Associates, Inc., and W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. (Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc., Govind & Associates, Inc., and W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00100-CV AND 13-09-00231-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________
INGRAM READYMIX, INC. AND SOUTHERN CONTRACTING, INC., Appellants,
v.
BENNETT, MARTIN, SOLKA AND TORNO, INC., GOVIND & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., Appellees. _____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, Ingram Readymix, Inc. and Southern Contracting, Inc.(“SCI”), perfected
an appeal from a judgment entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas,
in cause number 08-6125-G. SCI, Bennett, Martin, Solka & Torino, Inc.(“BMST”), and Govind & Associates, Inc. (“Govind”), have filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice.
SCI, BMST, and Govind have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that
they have resolved their disputes at mediation and request that this Court dismiss with
prejudice all of the claims in this case asserted by SCI against BMST and Govind.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss
with prejudice claims by SCI against BMST and Govind, is of the opinion that the motion
should be granted. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted,
and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In accordance with the
agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX . R.
APP. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for
rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
The appeal with respect to claims made by SCI against BMST and Govind is
ordered SEVERED from the remainder of the appeal. The Clerk shall create Cause No.
13-09-00231-CV styled Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc.
and Govind & Associates, Inc. The remainder of the parties remain under this original
cause number, 13-09-00100-CV.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 7th day of May, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc., Govind & Associates, Inc., and W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-contracting-inc-v-bennett-martin-solka-an-texapp-2009.