Southern Casualty Co. v. Vatter

278 S.W. 177, 115 Tex. 148, 1925 Tex. LEXIS 147
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 2, 1925·No. Application No. 14356.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authorities cited by the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion.

The brief of the plaintiff in error in the Court of Civil Appeals contained no statement with proper reference to the pages of the statement of facts showing whether the grounds of objection to the evidence discussed by the Court of Civil Appeals were true. It is therefore unnecessary for this court to consider whether error would have been shown had the brief of plaintiff in error disclosed the truth of the grounds of its objections.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Casualty Co. v. Vatter, 278 S.W. 177, 115 Tex. 148, 1925 Tex. LEXIS 147 (Tex. 1925).

278 S.W. 177 (Southern Casualty Co. v. Vatter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. Venable
112 S.W.2d 1069 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Warren v. Houston Oil Co. of Texas
296 S.W. 637 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Austin v. Freestone County
288 S.W. 870 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)