Southern California Retail Druggist Association, Limited v. Retail Clerks Union, Local No. 770, Etc.
This text of 178 F.2d 924 (Southern California Retail Druggist Association, Limited v. Retail Clerks Union, Local No. 770, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
178 F.2d 924
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RETAIL DRUGGIST ASSOCIATION, LIMITED, et
al., Appellants,
v.
RETAIL CLERKS UNION, LOCAL NO. 770, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 12273.
United States Court of Appeals
Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 6, 1950.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Ben Harrison, Judge.
J. Wesley Cupp, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Robert W. Gilbert, Louis A. Nissen, Los Angeles, Cal. (William B. Irvin, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellee Local 324, and others.
Alexander H. Schullman, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Local 770, and others.
Before HEALY, BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of the decision of this Court in California Association of Employers v. Building and Construction Trades Council, 9 Cir., 178 F.2d 175.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 F.2d 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-california-retail-druggist-association-limited-v-retail-clerks-ca9-1950.