Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holmes
This text of 89 So. 2d 530 (Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The questions sought to be presented on this appeal are not raised by assignments of error as required by Supreme Court Rule No. 1, Code of 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. The result is that the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed. Tidwell v. Town of Town Creek, 264 Ala. 330, 87 So.2d 646; Purvis v. Ennis, 258 Ala. 174, 61 So.2d 451; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 So. 2d 530, 265 Ala. 48, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-benefit-life-ins-co-v-holmes-ala-1956.