Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holmes

89 So. 2d 530, 265 Ala. 48, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 590
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 6, 1956·No. 4 Div. 880·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

SIMPSON, Justice.

The questions sought to be presented on this appeal are not raised by assignments of error as required by Supreme Court Rule No. 1, Code of 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. The result is that the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed. Tidwell v. Town of Town Creek, 264 Ala. 330, 87 So.2d 646; Purvis v. Ennis, 258 Ala. 174, 61 So.2d 451; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639.

Affirmed.

GOODWYN, MERRILL and SPANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holmes, 89 So. 2d 530, 265 Ala. 48, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 590 (Ala. 1956).

89 So. 2d 530 (Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westbrook v. Gibbs
231 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1970)
Howard v. Harrell
156 So. 2d 140 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Randolph v. Greason
152 So. 2d 156 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Erwin v. Erwin
114 So. 2d 918 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Hambrick v. Hambrick
108 So. 2d 165 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Long v. State
105 So. 2d 874 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)