Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Town of Surfside

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Town of Surfside

186 So. 2d 816, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 7, 1966

DocketNo. 64-780

StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 2d 816 (Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Town of Surfside) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Town of Surfside, 186 So. 2d 816, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on June 29, 1965 (177 So.2d 557) affirming the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed May 18, 1966 (186 So.2d 777) and mandate dated June 3, 1966, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause to the chancellor for entry of orders consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida ;

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court issued on August 23, 1965 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment filed on June 29, 1965 is vacated, the, said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the cause is remanded to the chancellor for entry of orders consistent with the said opinion and j'udgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on June 29, 1965 (177 So.2d 557) affirming the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed May 18, 1966 (186 So.2d 777) and mandate dated June 3, 1966, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause to the chancellor for entry of orders consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida ;

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court issued on August 23, 1965 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment filed on June 29, 1965 is vacated, the, said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the cause is remanded to the chancellor for entry of orders consistent with the said opinion and j'udgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 So. 2d 816, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-bell-telephone-telegraph-co-v-town-of-surfside-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack