Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. etc. v. Jean Charles, Jr., as nex friend etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. etc. v. Jean Charles, Jr., as nex friend etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 12, 2014

Docket14-3985

StatusPublished

This text of Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. etc. v. Jean Charles, Jr., as nex friend etc. (Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. etc. v. Jean Charles, Jr., as nex friend etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. etc. v. Jean Charles, Jr., as nex friend etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

SOUTHERN BAPTIST NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO HOSPITAL OF FLORIDA, INC. FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND D/B/A BAPTIST MEDICAL DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CENTER-SOUTH, CASE NO. 1D14-3985 Petitioner,

v.

JEAN CHARLES, JR., AS NEXT FRIEND AND DULY APPOINTED GUARDIAN OF HIS SISTER, MARIE CHARLES, AND HER MINOR CHILDREN, ANGEL ALSTON, JAZMIN HOUSTON AND ERVIN ALSTON, MINORS, KRISTIN FERNANDEZ, D.O., YUVAL Z. NOAT, M.D., SAFEER A. ASHRAF, M.D., INTEGRATED COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY NETWORK, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, ANDREW NAMEN, M.D., GREGORY J. SENGSTOCK, M.D., JOHN D. PENNINGTON, M.D., AND EUGENE R. BEBEAU, M.D.,

Respondents.

___________________________/

Opinion filed October 13, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction. George N. Meros, Jr. and James Timothy Moore, Jr., of GrayRobinson, P.A., Tallahassee; William E. Kuntz, Michael H. Harmon and Earl E. Googe, Jr., of Smith Hulsey & Busey, Jacksonville; Jack E. Holt, III, of Grower, Ketcham, Rutherford, Bronson, Eide & Telan, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioner.

Bryan S. Gowdy, of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondents Jean Charles, Jr., Marie Charles, Angel Alston, Jazmin Houston and Ervin Alston.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order granting a motion to compel

discovery that contemplates a future order to determine the scope and breadth of the

discovery and other related issues. However, as the order does not compel discovery,

petitioner has not demonstrated that the order will result in irreparable harm. See

Poston v. Wiggins, 112 So. 3d 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Accordingly, the petition for

writ of certiorari is denied. AVCO Corp. v. Neff, 30 So. 597, 601 (Fla. 1st DCA

2010).

Respondents’ motion, filed September 10, 2014, seeking dismissal of the

petition is hereby denied.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI