Southern Banking & Trust Co. v. Fidelity Banking & Trust Co.
This text of 33 S.E. 639 (Southern Banking & Trust Co. v. Fidelity Banking & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Though the act of October 21, 1891, “to prescribe the method of granting charters to banking companies,” etc., in the first section thereof declares that “ all banking companies hereafter chartered in this State shall have and exercise the powers . . hereinafter specified,” the word “ hereafter ” should not be construed as having the effect of rendering the language inserted in the fourth section of the above act by the amendatory act of December 20, 1893, whereby liens are created in favor of banking companies for debts due to them by stockholders upon stock held by the latter, operative as to stock which had already been issued by a banking company, chartered under the provisions of the first act, prior to its amendment. Acts 1890-91, vol. 1, p. 172; Acts 1893, p. 78.
'2. The amending act could in no event restrict the negotiability of any stock which was in existence when it was passed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.E. 639, 105 Ga. 487, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-banking-trust-co-v-fidelity-banking-trust-co-ga-1898.