Southerland v. . Webb

15 N.C. 245
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1833
StatusPublished

This text of 15 N.C. 245 (Southerland v. . Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southerland v. . Webb, 15 N.C. 245 (N.C. 1833).

Opinion

Daniei, Judge.

The slaves mentioned in the plaintiff’s declaration, were not the property of Miles Hardy and therefore did not pass to the plaintiff Harriet, on the death of her brother without issue, under the executory devise or bequest contained in her father’s will. The slaves originally belonged to Ducket, and the value of them went as so much money in satisfying the decree that was obtained against Ducket as executor. The transfer of these slaves by Dueket to Henry Hardy, vested in the said Henry the absolute legal estate. The amount of the decree, perhaps did belong to the plaintiffs, after the death of Henry without issue; and her interest* in the said decree might have been secured to the plaintiff by the court at the time it was rendered. But the Superior Cqjirt of Edgecomb was trying the question of legal property, and had no power to substitute the slaves that were rendered by Henry in satisfaction of that decree, for the money itself. We therefore think, that the judgment rendered in the said Superior Court must be af-finnqd.

Per Curiam — Judgment aeeirmrd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 N.C. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southerland-v-webb-nc-1833.