Southerland v. Rankin

2014 Ohio 2506
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 10, 2014
Docket13AP-1040
StatusPublished

This text of 2014 Ohio 2506 (Southerland v. Rankin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southerland v. Rankin, 2014 Ohio 2506 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

[Cite as Southerland v. Rankin, 2014-Ohio-2506.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

William Southerland, Jr., [Individually : and as Class Representative], : Plaintiff-Appellant, : v. No. 13AP-1040 : (C.P.C. No. 13CV-7698) Mike Rankin [Registrar, Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation] : (REGULAR CALENDAR) et al., : Defendants-Appellees. :

D E C I S I O N

Rendered on June 10, 2014

Goldenberg Schneider, L.P.A., Jeffrey S. Goldenberg and Todd B. Naylor, for appellant.

Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and William J. Cole, for appellees.

APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

TYACK, J.

{¶ 1} William Southerland, Jr., is appealing from the dismissal of his case filed in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. He assigns a single error for our consideration: The trial court erred by dismissing Plaintiff-Appellant William Southerland Jr.'s complaint based on an erroneous construction of R.C. 4507.24(B) that improperly expanded R.C. 4507.24(A)(2)'s deputy registrar's fee provision to cover applications for temporary instruction permits even though the plain text of R.C. 4507.24(A)(2) only refers to No. 13AP-1040 2

applications for driver's licenses, motorized bicycle licenses, and renewals thereof.

{¶ 2} Counsel for Southerland submits the following six issues as relevant to our consideration of the merits of his assignment of error: 1. Whether R.C. 4507.24(A) authorizes the Bureau of Motor Vehicles to charge temporary instruction permit applicants a $3.50 deputy registrar's fee in addition to application fees set forth in R.C. 4507.23, even though R.C. 4507.24(A) specifies by its very terms that the deputy registrar's fee applies only to "each application for renewal of a driver's license," R.C. 4507.24(A)(1), and "each application for a driver's license, or motorized bicycle license, or for renewal of a such a license." R.C. 4507.24(A)(2). (Assignment of Error I).

2. Whether R.C. 4507.24(B), which states that the deputy registrar's "fees prescribed by [R.C. 4507.24(A)] shall be in addition to the fee for a temporary instruction permit and examination, a driver's license, a motorized bicycle license, or duplicate thereof," expands the scope of R.C. 4507.24(A) to cover transactions beyond those categories specifically enumerated in R.C. 4507.24(A)(1) and R.C. 4507.24(A)(2). (Assignment of Error I).

3. Whether R.C. 4507.24(A) is unambiguous and must therefore be applied as written. (Assignment of Error I).

4. Whether the trial court's interpretation of R.C. 4507.24 runs afoul of the canon of statutory construction expressio unius est exclusion alterius which holds that "to express or include one thing implies the exclusion of the other, or of the alternative." (Assignment of Error I).

5. Whether the trial court's interpretation of R.C. 4507.24 improperly renders R.C. 4507.24(A)'s own language superfluous and meaningless in contravention of a canon of statutory construction. (Assignment of Error I).

6. Whether the 79-year legislative history of R.C. 4507.24 unequivocally demonstrates that deputy registrar's fees do not apply to applications for temporary instruction permits. (Assignment of Error I).

{¶ 3} As stated more succinctly by appellant: No. 13AP-1040 3

This putative class action alleges that the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles is violating the Ohio Revised Code by charging more than $18.50 for applications for temporary instruction permits.

{¶ 4} Southerland is the father of three children who in recent years have gotten temporary instruction permits. He is asserting on behalf of himself and the class he attempts to have recognized that he overpaid for the permits because he was assessed a deputy registrar's fee each time he helped his children get such a permit. He bases his assertion on R.C. 4507.23 and 4507.24(A). R.C. 4507.23 reads: Except as provided in division (I) of this section, each application for a temporary instruction permit and examination shall be accompanied by a fee of five dollars.

(B) Except as provided in division (I) of this section, each application for a driver's license made by a person who previously held such a license and whose license has expired not more than two years prior to the date of application, and who is required under this chapter to give an actual demonstration of the person's ability to drive, shall be accompanied by a fee of three dollars in addition to any other fees.

(C)

(1) Except as provided in divisions (E) and (I) of this section, each application for a driver's license, or motorcycle operator's endorsement, or renewal of a driver's license shall be accompanied by a fee of six dollars.

(2) Except as provided in division (I) of this section, each application for a duplicate driver's license shall be accompanied by a fee of seven dollars and fifty cents. The duplicate driver's licenses issued under this section shall be distributed by the deputy registrar in accordance with rules adopted by the registrar of motor vehicles.

(D) Except as provided in division (I) of this section, each application for a motorized bicycle license or duplicate thereof shall be accompanied by a fee of two dollars and fifty cents. No. 13AP-1040 4

(E) Except as provided in division (I) of this section, each application for a driver's license or renewal of a driver's license that will be issued to a person who is less than twenty-one years of age shall be accompanied by whichever of the following fees is applicable:

(1) If the person is sixteen years of age or older, but less than seventeen years of age, a fee of seven dollars and twenty-five cents;

(2) If the person is seventeen years of age or older, but less than eighteen years of age, a fee of six dollars;

(3) If the person is eighteen years of age or older, but less than nineteen years of age, a fee of four dollars and seventy- five cents;

(4) If the person is nineteen years of age or older, but less than twenty years of age, a fee of three dollars and fifty cents;

(5) If the person is twenty years of age or older, but less than twenty-one years of age, a fee of two dollars and twenty-five cents.

(F) Neither the registrar nor any deputy registrar shall charge a fee in excess of one dollar and fifty cents for laminating a driver's license, motorized bicycle license, or temporary instruction permit identification cards as required by sections 4507.13 and 4511.521 of the Revised Code. A deputy registrar laminating a driver's license, motorized bicycle license, or temporary instruction permit identification cards shall retain the entire amount of the fee charged for lamination, less the actual cost to the registrar of the laminating materials used for that lamination, as specified in the contract executed by the bureau for the laminating materials and laminating equipment. The deputy registrar shall forward the amount of the cost of the laminating materials to the registrar for deposit as provided in this section.

(G) Except as provided in division (I) of this section, each transaction described in divisions (A), (B), (C), (D), and (E) of this section shall be accompanied by an additional fee of twelve dollars. The additional fee is for the purpose of defraying the department of public safety's costs associated No. 13AP-1040 5

with the administration and enforcement of the motor vehicle and traffic laws of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ohio 2506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southerland-v-rankin-ohioctapp-2014.