Southerland v. Mead

New York Supreme Court

Southerland v. Mead

4 N.Y. St. Rep. 887

DecidedDecember 14, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 887 (Southerland v. Mead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southerland v. Mead, 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 887 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Dykman, J.

There was a motion for an attachment for contempt against the defendant, and it was denied and now the defendant has appealed from the order. It is true that the denial was conditional, but the appeal is from the entire order, and not from that portion imposing the condition.

[888]*888The order was favorable to the defendant in any view, and there is no merit in the appeal.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs, besides disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.

There was a motion for an attachment for contempt against the defendant, and it was denied and now the defendant has appealed from the order. It is true that the denial was conditional, but the appeal is from the entire order, and not from that portion imposing the condition.

[888]*888The order was favorable to the defendant in any view, and there is no merit in the appeal.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs, besides disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 N.Y. St. Rep. 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southerland-v-mead-nysupct-1886.