Southerland v. Jackson

30 Me. 462
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1849·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wells, J. orally.

— Where a street is marked on a plan, the fee remains in the grantor. Until it is opened, no action for obstructing it can be maintained. The instruction was therefore erroneous. If one grantor could maintain such an action, all of them could. Even if the street had been opened, it might be doubtful whether a person living on one of the lots could maintain such an action, except on proof of ■special damage. Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southerland v. Jackson, 30 Me. 462 (Me. 1849).

30 Me. 462 (Southerland v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loud v. Brooks
217 N.W. 34 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1928)