Southerland v. . Crump

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Southerland v. . Crump

142 S.E. 7, 195 N.C. 856, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 228

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 14, 1928

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 142 S.E. 7 (Southerland v. . Crump) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southerland v. . Crump, 142 S.E. 7, 195 N.C. 856, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 228 (N.C. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Conceding that there was some evidence tending to sustain plaintiff’s allegation of an express contract by which defendant’s testator agreed to pay plaintiff for services to be rendered to him by plaintiff, there was no error in the judgment dismissing the action, at the close of all the evidence, under 0. S., 567. There was no evidence tending to show performance by plaintiff of the alleged contract.

In the absence of such evidence, plaintiff cannot recover in this action. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Conceding that there was some evidence tending to sustain plaintiff’s allegation of an express contract by which defendant’s testator agreed to pay plaintiff for services to be rendered to him by plaintiff, there was no error in the judgment dismissing the action, at the close of all the evidence, under 0. S., 567. There was no evidence tending to show performance by plaintiff of the alleged contract.

In the absence of such evidence, plaintiff cannot recover in this action. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 S.E. 7, 195 N.C. 856, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southerland-v-crump-nc-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack