Southerland v. . Crump
142 S.E. 7, 195 N.C. 856, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 228
Opinion
Conceding that there was some evidence tending to sustain plaintiff’s allegation of an express contract by which defendant’s testator agreed to pay plaintiff for services to be rendered to him by plaintiff, there was no error in the judgment dismissing the action, at the close of all the evidence, under 0. S., 567. There was no evidence tending to show performance by plaintiff of the alleged contract.
In the absence of such evidence, plaintiff cannot recover in this action. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southerland v. . Crump, 142 S.E. 7, 195 N.C. 856, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 228 (N.C. 1928).
142 S.E. 7 (Southerland v. . Crump) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southerland v. . Crump
153 S.E. 845 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)