Southerland v. Bedford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Southerland v. Bedford

256 S.E.2d 121, 149 Ga. App. 758, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2018

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 30, 1979·No. 57548·Published

Opinion

Underwood, Judge.

In this garnishment proceeding the trial court properly granted judgment against the garnishee for the sum admitted to be subject to garnishment but not delivered to the court, Code Ann. § 46-510 (c); garnishee was not relieved of the responsibility of delivering the money merely because the defendant had filed a traverse, Code Ann. § 46-402; and no reversible error has been made to appear by the record for any reason assigned. Consequently the judgment against the garnishee for the sum admitted to be due is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Underwood, Judge.

In this garnishment proceeding the trial court properly granted judgment against the garnishee for the sum admitted to be subject to garnishment but not delivered to the court, Code Ann. § 46-510 (c); garnishee was not relieved of the responsibility of delivering the money merely because the defendant had filed a traverse, Code Ann. § 46-402; and no reversible error has been made to appear by the record for any reason assigned. Consequently the judgment against the garnishee for the sum admitted to be due is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Southerland v. Bedford, 256 S.E.2d 121, 149 Ga. App. 758, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2018 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

256 S.E.2d 121 (Southerland v. Bedford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.