Souther v. Kichline

183 S.E.2d 87, 124 Ga. App. 111, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 831
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 22, 1971·No. 45982·Published

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the grant of appellee’s motion for summary judgment in a processioning proceeding. The appellant was one of two applicants in the court below and the appellee was one of the protestants. The appellee pleaded the defense of res judicata and moved for summary judgment on this ground. He supported the motion with the record of a prior processioning proceeding between the same parties to this case concerning the same issue of boundary and in which the appellee obtained judgment in his favor. The appellant made no contrary showing. The motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Code § 110-501; § 56 (e) of the Civil Practice Act (Code Ann. § 81A-156 (e)); Register v. Herrin, 224 Ga. 673 (164 SE2d 124).

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Deen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Souther v. Kichline, 183 S.E.2d 87, 124 Ga. App. 111, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 831 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

183 S.E.2d 87 (Souther v. Kichline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Register v. Herrin
164 S.E.2d 124 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)