Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C. v. Sterling Brown, as Surviving Spouse
This text of 818 S.E.2d 259 (Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C. v. Sterling Brown, as Surviving Spouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*187
In
Doherty v. Brown
,
Thus, we vacate our opinion in these cases and adopt the opinion of our Supreme Court as our own. In accordance with the directive of the Supreme Court, the jury's verdict *260 must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. *188 Judgment reversed.
Rickman and Goss, JJ., concur.
The plaintiff-appellants in Case No. A16A0764,
Brown et al. v. Southeastern Pain Specialists
,
et al.
, did not file a separate petition challenging this Court's affirmance of the trial court's exclusion of certain evidence and denial of their motion for a mistrial. Thus, as to the evidentiary issues ruled on and asserted in that appeal, the Supreme Court held that the issues were "beyond the scope of [its] grant of certiorari" but, "the trial court remains free to revisit its ruling as it considers the admissibility of evidence on retrial."
Southeastern Pain Specialists
at
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
818 S.E.2d 259, 347 Ga. App. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southeastern-pain-specialists-pc-v-sterling-brown-as-surviving-spouse-gactapp-2018.