Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C. v. Sterling Brown, as Surviving Spouse

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C. v. Sterling Brown, as Surviving Spouse

818 S.E.2d 259, 347 Ga. App. 187

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 15, 2018·No. A16A0763; A16A0765; A16A0766·Published

Opinion

Barnes, Presiding Judge.

*187 In Doherty v. Brown , 339 Ga. App. 567 , 794 S.E.2d 217 (2016) this Court affirmed the jury's verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. However, in Southeastern Pain Specialists, P. C. v. Brown , 303 Ga. 265 , 811 S.E.2d 360 (2018), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed this Court's opinion upon finding that because the evidence did not support the claim, the trial court had erred in giving an instruction on ordinary negligence. Id. at 272-273 (2) (b), 811 S.E.2d 360 . The Court instructed that this Court "on remand order a full retrial as to the appellants." Id. at 266, 811 S.E.2d 360 . 1

Thus, we vacate our opinion in these cases and adopt the opinion of our Supreme Court as our own. In accordance with the directive of the Supreme Court, the jury's verdict *260 must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. *188 Judgment reversed.

Rickman and Goss, JJ., concur.

1

The plaintiff-appellants in Case No. A16A0764, Brown et al. v. Southeastern Pain Specialists , et al. , did not file a separate petition challenging this Court's affirmance of the trial court's exclusion of certain evidence and denial of their motion for a mistrial. Thus, as to the evidentiary issues ruled on and asserted in that appeal, the Supreme Court held that the issues were "beyond the scope of [its] grant of certiorari" but, "the trial court remains free to revisit its ruling as it considers the admissibility of evidence on retrial." Southeastern Pain Specialists at 303 Ga. at 274-275 (2) (c), 811 S.E.2d 360 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes, Presiding Judge.

*187 In Doherty v. Brown , 339 Ga. App. 567 , 794 S.E.2d 217 (2016) this Court affirmed the jury's verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. However, in Southeastern Pain Specialists, P. C. v. Brown , 303 Ga. 265 , 811 S.E.2d 360 (2018), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed this Court's opinion upon finding that because the evidence did not support the claim, the trial court had erred in giving an instruction on ordinary negligence. Id. at 272-273 (2) (b), 811 S.E.2d 360 . The Court instructed that this Court "on remand order a full retrial as to the appellants." Id. at 266, 811 S.E.2d 360 . 1

Thus, we vacate our opinion in these cases and adopt the opinion of our Supreme Court as our own. In accordance with the directive of the Supreme Court, the jury's verdict *260 must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. *188 Judgment reversed.

Rickman and Goss, JJ., concur.

1

The plaintiff-appellants in Case No. A16A0764, Brown et al. v. Southeastern Pain Specialists , et al. , did not file a separate petition challenging this Court's affirmance of the trial court's exclusion of certain evidence and denial of their motion for a mistrial. Thus, as to the evidentiary issues ruled on and asserted in that appeal, the Supreme Court held that the issues were "beyond the scope of [its] grant of certiorari" but, "the trial court remains free to revisit its ruling as it considers the admissibility of evidence on retrial." Southeastern Pain Specialists at 303 Ga. at 274-275 (2) (c), 811 S.E.2d 360 .

Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C. v. Sterling Brown, as Surviving Spouse, 818 S.E.2d 259, 347 Ga. App. 187 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

818 S.E.2d 259 (Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C. v. Sterling Brown, as Surviving Spouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related