Southeastern Iron Workers Health Care Plan v. Engle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Southeastern Iron Workers Health Care Plan v. Engle

813 So. 2d 290, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4972, 2002 WL 561692

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 17, 2002·No. No. 3D00-3470·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to intervene. We affirm. See Florida Wildlife Fed’n, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement, 707 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 5th DCA) (holding that “intervention is a matter of a court’s discretion”), review denied, 718 So.2d 167 (Fla.1998); Hatcher v. Roberts, 478 So.2d 1083, 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So.2d 68 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to intervene. We affirm. See Florida Wildlife Fed’n, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement, 707 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 5th DCA) (holding that “intervention is a matter of a court’s discretion”), review denied, 718 So.2d 167 (Fla.1998); Hatcher v. Roberts, 478 So.2d 1083, 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So.2d 68 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Southeastern Iron Workers Health Care Plan v. Engle, 813 So. 2d 290, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4972, 2002 WL 561692 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

813 So. 2d 290 (Southeastern Iron Workers Health Care Plan v. Engle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related