Southeastern Foam Products, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Southeastern Foam Products, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

254 S.E.2d 494, 149 Ga. App. 372, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1853

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 16, 1979·No. 57076·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

The trial court correctly granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment.

Appellant Southeastern Farm Products’ 1977, mid-winter sales meeting was held at appellee’s Atlanta hotel. Southeastern had hired Kennedy Travel Agency to arrange the meeting on Southeastern’s behalf. Southeastern paid Kennedy for the hotel charges, but Kennedy failed to pay appellee. The latter brought this suit on open account. The sole question for decision on appeal is whether the trial court properly held Southeastern liable for the hotel charges. We conclude the trial court was correct.

The evidence in the record conclusively established that Kennedy was Southeastern’s disclosed agent in making arrangements for hotel accommodations with appellee. That being the case, Southeastern was bound for the unpaid debt (Code §§ 4-302 and 4-304), unless it [373] appeared that appellee had "chosen to make the agent [its] debtor, dealing with [the agent] and [the agent] alone, and that exclusive credit was given to [the agent] ...” Fontaine v. Eagle & Phenix Mfg. Co., 52 Ga. 31, 34 (1974); Code § 4-306. The evidence did not suffice to present an issue of fact as to the existence of that exception to the principal’s liability.

Submitted January 15, 1979 — Decided March 16, 1979. Richard P. Perry, J. Randolph Hicks, for appellants. Gambrell, Russell & Forbes, Douglas N. Campbell, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge.

The trial court correctly granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment.

Appellant Southeastern Farm Products’ 1977, mid-winter sales meeting was held at appellee’s Atlanta hotel. Southeastern had hired Kennedy Travel Agency to arrange the meeting on Southeastern’s behalf. Southeastern paid Kennedy for the hotel charges, but Kennedy failed to pay appellee. The latter brought this suit on open account. The sole question for decision on appeal is whether the trial court properly held Southeastern liable for the hotel charges. We conclude the trial court was correct.

The evidence in the record conclusively established that Kennedy was Southeastern’s disclosed agent in making arrangements for hotel accommodations with appellee. That being the case, Southeastern was bound for the unpaid debt (Code §§ 4-302 and 4-304), unless it [373] appeared that appellee had "chosen to make the agent [its] debtor, dealing with [the agent] and [the agent] alone, and that exclusive credit was given to [the agent] ...” Fontaine v. Eagle & Phenix Mfg. Co., 52 Ga. 31, 34 (1974); Code § 4-306. The evidence did not suffice to present an issue of fact as to the existence of that exception to the principal’s liability.

Submitted January 15, 1979 — Decided March 16, 1979. Richard P. Perry, J. Randolph Hicks, for appellants. Gambrell, Russell & Forbes, Douglas N. Campbell, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Southeastern Foam Products, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 254 S.E.2d 494, 149 Ga. App. 372, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1853 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

254 S.E.2d 494 (Southeastern Foam Products, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related