Southeastern Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Page

N.D. Georgia

Southeastern Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Page

1 F.R.D. 363, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1954

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia

DecidedMarch 20, 1940

DocketNo. 2181

StatusPublished

This text of 1 F.R.D. 363 (Southeastern Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southeastern Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Page, 1 F.R.D. 363, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1954 (N.D. Ga. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

BARRETT, District Judge.

It appearing to the court that the defendants by their counsel in the above-entitled cause filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s petition under Rule 12(b) (6) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, on the 30th day of October, 1939:

[364]*364It further appearing that the case having been regularly and duly assigned for hearing on the calendar for this date, and on motion of the defendant’s counsel, the plaintiff’s petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, and the motion to dismiss under said rule of the Rules of Civil Procedure be, and the same is hereby, sustained.

It is further considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that judgment be entered against the plaintiff for the amount of costs of said proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARRETT, District Judge.

It appearing to the court that the defendants by their counsel in the above-entitled cause filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s petition under Rule 12(b) (6) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, on the 30th day of October, 1939:

[364]*364It further appearing that the case having been regularly and duly assigned for hearing on the calendar for this date, and on motion of the defendant’s counsel, the plaintiff’s petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, and the motion to dismiss under said rule of the Rules of Civil Procedure be, and the same is hereby, sustained.

It is further considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that judgment be entered against the plaintiff for the amount of costs of said proceeding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 F.R.D. 363, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southeastern-compress-warehouse-co-v-page-gand-1940.