Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena
106 So. 3d 1009, 2013 WL 615338, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2604
Opinion
Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena, 106 So. 3d 1009, 2013 WL 615338, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2604 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
106 So. 3d 1009 (Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PARIZ v. Colon
77 So. 3d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co.
854 So. 2d 841 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)