Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena
106 So. 3d 1009, 2013 WL 615338, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2604
This text of 106 So. 3d 1009 (Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena, 106 So. 3d 1009, 2013 WL 615338, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2604 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
Opinion
Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
PARIZ v. Colon
77 So. 3d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co.
854 So. 2d 841 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 So. 3d 1009, 2013 WL 615338, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southeast-fish-seafood-co-v-cadena-fladistctapp-2013.