Southeast First National Bank v. Bradshaw

Florida Circuit Courts

Southeast First National Bank v. Bradshaw

6 Fla. Supp. 2d 158

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 1982

DocketCase No. 81-389-AP

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 158 (Southeast First National Bank v. Bradshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southeast First National Bank v. Bradshaw, 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 158 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

KORVICK, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a final judgment entered in behalf of Appellee denying recovery of a Deficiency balance owing from the appellee, Mary Jane Bradshaw.

Appellant raises the issue: Is a Bank regulated by Florida Statute 516.31, and states that the Appellant, Southeast First National Bank of Miami, is a banking institution, which the Florida legislature specifically intended to exclude from the provisions of Chapter 516.

This Appellate Panel, having reviewed the briefs and having heard [159]*159arguments of counsel, reverses the finding of the trial court, and holds that the appellant, Southeast First National Bank of Miami, is a banking institution and that banking institutions are not governed by the provisions of Chapter 516.

Accordingly, we reverse the finding of the trial court and direct the court to enter a deficiency judgment against the appellee, Mary Jane Bradshaw.

REVERSED

Judges Goldman and Orr concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI