Southeast First Leasing, Inc. v. Koontz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Southeast First Leasing, Inc. v. Koontz

431 So. 2d 333, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20767

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 1983·No. No. 83-286·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from an order transferring venue to Orange County. With the singular exception that the lease payments sued for were due in Dade County, virtually every pertinent contact with the case was with the transferee forum. The trial court’s discretion was therefore so obviously properly exercised under Sec. 47.-122, Fla.Stat. (1981), e.g., Peterson, Howell & Heather v. O’Neill, 314 So.2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), that this appeal is entirely frivolous. We have accordingly granted the appellees’ several motions for attorney’s fees under Sec. 57.105, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from an order transferring venue to Orange County. With the singular exception that the lease payments sued for were due in Dade County, virtually every pertinent contact with the case was with the transferee forum. The trial court’s discretion was therefore so obviously properly exercised under Sec. 47.-122, Fla.Stat. (1981), e.g., Peterson, Howell & Heather v. O’Neill, 314 So.2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), that this appeal is entirely frivolous. We have accordingly granted the appellees’ several motions for attorney’s fees under Sec. 57.105, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Affirmed.

Southeast First Leasing, Inc. v. Koontz, 431 So. 2d 333, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20767 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

431 So. 2d 333 (Southeast First Leasing, Inc. v. Koontz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related