Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Serignese

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Serignese

518 So. 2d 967, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 235, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 277, 1988 WL 4041

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 19, 1988

DocketNo. 87-862

StatusPublished

This text of 518 So. 2d 967 (Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Serignese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Serignese, 518 So. 2d 967, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 235, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 277, 1988 WL 4041 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The action below to collect moneys due for credit card charges was transferred ex mero motu from Dade to Volusia County (the place where the defendants apparently reside) after defaults had been entered against the personally-served defendants for failing to respond to the complaint. We reverse the order under review upon a holding that there is no public policy reason to prevent the parties from agreeing, as they did, that venue of any action to enforce the agreement be in Dade County, see Fine v. Carney Bank of Broward County, 508 So.2d 558 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), and no reason, in the usual case (which this most certainly is), not to permit such an agreement to control the venue of the suit.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The action below to collect moneys due for credit card charges was transferred ex mero motu from Dade to Volusia County (the place where the defendants apparently reside) after defaults had been entered against the personally-served defendants for failing to respond to the complaint. We reverse the order under review upon a holding that there is no public policy reason to prevent the parties from agreeing, as they did, that venue of any action to enforce the agreement be in Dade County, see Fine v. Carney Bank of Broward County, 508 So.2d 558 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), and no reason, in the usual case (which this most certainly is), not to permit such an agreement to control the venue of the suit.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

518 So. 2d 967, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 235, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 277, 1988 WL 4041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southeast-bank-na-v-serignese-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack