Southdown Sugars, Inc. v. Brooks
69 So. 2d 87, 1953 La. App. LEXIS 891
Opinion
The District Judge has filed an answer in this matter, alleging that the defendants failed to offer any proof or other evidence establishing jurisdictional basis for appeal, which is fully substantiated by reference to the evidence in the case.
Therefore for the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Milliken & Farwell, Inc., v. Brown, (Godchaux Sugars, Inc., v. Bolotte) La.App., 69 So.2d 85, the rule herein issued on Nov. 4th is hereby recalled and vacated, and relators’ application is dismissed at their cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southdown Sugars, Inc. v. Brooks, 69 So. 2d 87, 1953 La. App. LEXIS 891 (La. Ct. App. 1953).
69 So. 2d 87 (Southdown Sugars, Inc. v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Milliken & Farwell, Inc. v. Brown
69 So. 2d 85 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1953)