Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/Southdown Sugars, Inc. v. Brooks

Southdown Sugars, Inc. v. Brooks

69 So. 2d 87, 1953 La. App. LEXIS 891
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 9, 1953
DocketNo. 3775
StatusPublished

This text of 69 So. 2d 87 (Southdown Sugars, Inc. v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southdown Sugars, Inc. v. Brooks, 69 So. 2d 87, 1953 La. App. LEXIS 891 (La. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Judge has filed an answer in this matter, alleging that the defendants failed to offer any proof or other evidence establishing jurisdictional basis for appeal, which is fully substantiated by reference to the evidence in the case.

Therefore for the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Milliken & Farwell, Inc., v. Brown, (Godchaux Sugars, Inc., v. Bolotte) La.App., 69 So.2d 85, the rule herein issued on Nov. 4th is hereby recalled and vacated, and relators’ application is dismissed at their cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milliken & Farwell, Inc. v. Brown
69 So. 2d 85 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 So. 2d 87, 1953 La. App. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southdown-sugars-inc-v-brooks-lactapp-1953.