Southbridge Park, Inc. v. Borough of Fort Lee
6 N.J. Tax 351
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the Tax court, substantially for the reasons given by John J. Hopkins, J.T.C. in his opinion in this matter published in 4 N.J.Tax 30 (1981). We add that by reason of the stipulation entered into by plaintiff at the pretrial conference we conceive no reason for a remand.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southbridge Park, Inc. v. Borough of Fort Lee, 6 N.J. Tax 351 (N.J. Ct. App. 1984).
6 N.J. Tax 351 (Southbridge Park, Inc. v. Borough of Fort Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The Senior Citizens Center of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Volodimir V.Township of Franklin
New Jersey Tax Court, 2018
Elizabeth Center Apartments Urban-Renewal Corp. v. City of Elizabeth
28 N.J. Tax 280 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)
Elizabeth Center Apartments Urban Renewal Corp. v. City of Elizabeth
27 N.J. Tax 196 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2013)
Southbridge Park, Inc. v. Borough of Fort Lee
492 A.2d 1026 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
Southbridge Park, Inc. v. Fort Lee Borough
7 N.J. Tax 578 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1984)