Southbay Gunite Inc. v. South Pools Inc. and Muhammad "Mike" Tello

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 13, 2022·No. 14-20-00574-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed June 13, 2022

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00574-CV

SOUTHBAY GUNITE INC., Appellant V.

SOUTH POOLS INC. AND MUHAMMAD "MIKE" TELLO, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 1 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1145370

ORDER

The clerk’s record was filed September 10, 2020. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain.

1. Plaintiff’s Response to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss filed on May 27, 2020.

2. Defendant’s Response to the Response to the Motion to Dismiss filed on May 27, 2020.

3. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed on September 2, 2020.

The Harris County Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before June 23, 2022, containing the above documents.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the county clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southbay Gunite Inc. v. South Pools Inc. and Muhammad "Mike" Tello, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Southbay Gunite Inc. v. South Pools Inc. and Muhammad "Mike" Tello (Southbay Gunite Inc. v. South Pools Inc. and Muhammad "Mike" Tello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.